feedback loop" from many big funds shorting volatility.
contango data back to 2004, the VIX futures were only in backwardation when spot VIX had a high of under 15 once on 3/8/2007, and the backwardation was -.29%.
Looking back even recently to ~2011, we can see every backwardation event was accompanied by a high spot VIX >20, until now.
So what to do?
Personally, I've added short SVXY calls to my position, extending my downside breakevens and adding a little long vol to take advantage of the futures curve. Going forward, if this structure holds, I think I'll lean towards SVXY strangles/adding short calls onto my existing short puts as the backwardation takes a lot of risk off of the upside.
I'll probably get assigned stock on the puts on some of these expirations, at which point I'll basically be in SVXY covered calls, keeping the long term short VIX assumption.
But does this make sense?
I'm still holding to the core belief that VIX has to return to contango, as the concept of free insurance just doesn't make sense. However, at the same time I'm not rigidly holding to the belief that the market or any part of our modern era has to make sense. Flat earth and geocentrism made perfect sense as well! (Now mix flat earth with uncharted waters)
With volatility as an asset class, it got me thinking about the other asset classes that don't make sense-
Negative interest rates- If you explain the concept of savings to a small child, or even mildly lucid marsupials, they will point out immediately how little sense it makes to lock in a loss of capital. Of course you can academically say there are reasons and structures for why interest rates will go negative, but the glaring conceptual problem on the surface remains.
Swap/Treasury rates- This is less of a retail/small investor trade, but looking at various articles on over-the-counter swaps trading lower than 'risk free' US Treasuries, we see another glaring issue- How would something with more risk than an identical product ever be worth less, how is there no floor?
Has VIX ascended into the now trinity of asset classes which make no conceptual sense? I was trying to wait a little to start writing about this as who knows, it could correct tomorrow. Even if it does, that doesn't change the fact that a new floor or ceiling has been breached for volatility, so I might as well yell anyway.
One upside to all of this is the unknown of the market holds, and surprises us in new ways each time. At the first level of investing we think something is overvalued or undervalued and take the corresponding position. We soon learn that something "overvalued" can keep going up, even to a $1 Trillion market cap. For this reason I think you should throw fundamental analysis out the door if you haven't already.
Step two is to trade based on mechanics such as convergence/divergence, contracting volatility, etc. Unsurprisingly even then, trading based on a mechanical fundamental such as "interest rates can't be negative" will eventually break down. The upside of all of this is that any market (even one of ideas) can be two-sided, which theoretically means continuing liquidity.
I am still SHORT VIX! However- given the pricing of futures I think it makes sense to convert some short SVXY puts to strangles, adding some premium where there is a little less risk than there was previously.
And if none of that makes sense, in addition to the fact that its all probably wrong, instead just look at what the futures curve is telling you:
Just do it!